DECLARATION

This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree.

Signed………………………………………………..

Date………………………………………………….

STATEMENT 1

This dissertation is being submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MSc.

Signed……………………………………………….

Date…………………………………………………

STATEMENT 2

This dissertation is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated.

Signed……………………………………………….

Date…………………………………………………

STATEMENT 3

I hereby give consent for my dissertation, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations.

Signed……………………………………………..

Date………………………………………………..

The aim of the dissertation is to find out if the scoping process, to produce Environmental Impact Assessments, in the Maltese extractive industry, is carried out in an appropriate manner.

Scoping is a process whereby the significant impacts of a development are identified and are earmarked for a deeper study through the impact assessment report.

The quarrying industry still uses old technology and is unwilling to modernise, due to the financial burden involved.

The Environment Planning Act, 1991 was utilised by the recently established Planning Authority, to request quarry owners, who wanted to extend their zone, to produce an Environmental impact assessment (EIA) according to a set Terms of Reference.

The study utilised three methods to reach its aim:

1. a matrix analysis of the EIA reports in the quarry industry;

2. a questionnaire analysis aimed at specific targeted groups, to elicit their perceptions about the process and its management;

3. interviews with key personalities involved in the EIA process and in the industry, to evoke the problems encountered and the reasons behind their actions.

The study found that the approach adopted by the Planning Authority is giving unsatisfactory results. The whole EIA process and its basic requirements are unknown to the various groups of people studied. It has also shown the lack of availability of baseline studies, making it difficult to establish significant impacts. There is also a need for a deeper analysis of the management techniques and the technology utilised in the extractive industry.

The study recommends the restructuring of the:

1. quarry industry;

2. Environment Management Unit within the Planning Authority to include all aspects of impact assessment under its umbrella;

3. Environment Protection Department to act as a complementary part in the technical nature of the EIA process.

A series of educational courses aimed at the key participants of the process is also recommended.

I would like to express my gratitude to Mr. Godwin Cassar, Director Planning for allowing me to view the Environmental Impact Assessment reports. Thanks are also due to Mr. Adrian Mallia, Mr. Dimitrio Duca and Mr. Kevin Mercieca from the Environment Management Unit, EMU, at the Planning Authority for all their help and suggestions.

I would also like to show my appreciation to Mrs. Marie Louise Mangion for her invaluable assistance to compile and analyse the questionnaire.

My sincere thanks must also go to Dr. A.J. Bond and all the staff at the EIA Unit from The University of Wales in Aberystwyth, who during the past years have supported me and given me advice throughout the whole course and during the thesis.

I am also grateful to several employees at the Planning Authority and work colleagues for helping me during the various stages of my dissertation. My final word of thanks must go to all the interviewees and all the respondents who spared some of their time to answer my questionnaire.